Waferpedia

Comparison ledger

Centura I Phase II Oxideversus110

Applied Materials Centura I Phase II Oxide, Tegal 110, side by side. Every value shown is drawn from the cited encyclopedia entries.

Email
Side-by-side comparison of selected equipment models
Attribute
Centura I Phase II OxideApplied Materials
110Tegal
OEMApplied MaterialsTegal
CategoryEtchEtch
Wafer size——
Process node——
Introduced——
Production run——
Lifecycle——
Lifecycle milestones——
Control system——
Generation——
FamilyApplied Materials CenturaTegal 110
Cited variants—
Specifications
ConfigurationUpgradable to 8"[2]—
Need to replace5-phase motor driver, indexer, turbo pump and controller, e-chuck, MFC's[2]—
Wafer size (original)6 inch[2]—
Wafer size (upgrade target)8 inch (200 mm)[2]—
Wafer size (alternate configuration)200 mm[3]—
Model designation alternative5200 Centura I Phase II[3]—
model—110 SE[1]
application focus—process development applications[1]
process capability—deep silicon plasma etching[1]
capabilities—very high aspect ratio trench etch and profile control[1]
configuration—multiple configurations with minimum technical intervention[1]
System type—plasma etch system[4]
Supported components—MEMS and 3D-IC components[1]
Control capability—very high aspect ratio trench etch and profile control[4]
Physical description—compact[1]

Plan your fab

Building a Etch process? Get a complete equipment list.

Open the fab equipment planner →
Sources (4)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]web.archive.orgweb.archive.org
  2. [2]inventory listing
  3. [3]fabsurplus.comfabsurplus.com
  4. [4]waferpedia.comwaferpedia.com