Waferpedia

Cohu

Rasco SO1000

Test & ProbeCohu Rasco SO1000 family
Research Quality: 40% complete
Email

Provisional entry — research in progress

This page was generated automatically from cited public sources and hasn't completed the full research pass yet. Every specification shown carries its source; more detail is added as research completes.

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is a gravity test handler. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is designed to handle small SOIC, SSOP, TSSOP, MSOP, and SOT packages. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is specified with up to 14,000 UPH.[1]

CohuRasco SO1000
No photo available yet

What it is

General reference — not yet source-verified

Test handlers are semiconductor back-end machines that present packaged devices to electrical test equipment in a controlled sequence. Gravity handlers use guided part movement and indexing hardware to move singulated packages from input media through a test contact position and then toward output sorting paths. Test handlers sit around the electrical test stage rather than around wafer fabrication steps.

How it works

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is designed to handle small SOIC, SSOP, TSSOP, MSOP, and SOT packages. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 supports dual-site and quad-site configurations, and the machine can also operate in a direct plunge-to-board arrangement. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 uses tube input and output, with quick adjustment and four manual outputs. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 features a fast plunger with up to four plunger heads. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is available in single, dual, and quad configurations.[1]

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is specified for up to 14000 UPH. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is specified with index time down to 500 ms. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 supports package sizes from MSOP 118 mil to SO 430 mil. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 also supports QFN sizes from 3 mm to 12 mm. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 supports a tri-temp range from -60°C to +175°C with temperature accuracy of +/- 2°C. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 offers multiple MEMS stimuli. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 also includes software analytics options through the PAICe Digital Twin Platform for real-time equipment monitoring, management, preventative maintenance, central recipe management, and unified reports.[1]

Where it fits in the process flow

General reference — not yet source-verified

Test handlers are used after wafer processing, assembly, and singulation, when devices have already been packaged into discrete units. Test handlers sit with automated test equipment in semiconductor back-end operations and support electrical screening, characterization, and production test on packaged parts. Test handlers commonly connect upstream to package loading media and downstream to sorting, retest, marking, or packing flows.

What do the numbers mean?

Wafer handling2

Type
Gravity test handler[1]
Accurate?
Handler style
Tube-to-tube[1]
Accurate?

Performance2

Throughput
Up to 14,000 UPH[1]
Accurate?
Temperature accuracy
+/- 2°C[1]
Accurate?

Configuration & options10

OEM
Cohu[2]
Accurate?
Model
Rasco SO1000[2]
Accurate?
Category
Test and Scan[2]
Accurate?
Package support
Small SOIC, SSOP, TSSOP, MSOP, and SOT packages[1]
Accurate?
Site configuration
Single, dual, and quad configurations[1]
Accurate?
Test sites
4 test sites[1]
Accurate?
Index time
Down to 500 ms[1]
Accurate?
Temperature range
Full tri-temp range -60°C to +175°C[1]
Accurate?
Package size range
MSOP 118 mil to SO 430 mil; QFN 3 mm to 12 mm[1]
Accurate?
Automation platform
PAICe Digital Twin Platform[1]
Accurate?
Interested in this tool?
Need help with this tool?Embed spec card

Where are the manuals?

Generated from public-source data on file. Enter your email to access — nothing is published; details are routed privately.

Not publicly documented

Field notes

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Worked with this tool? Help preserve its knowledge →

Frequently asked questions

What package types does the Cohu Rasco SO1000 handle?

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is designed to handle small SOIC, SSOP, TSSOP, MSOP, and SOT packages. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 also covers QFN package sizes from 3 mm to 12 mm.[1]

What configurations does the Cohu Rasco SO1000 support?

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 supports dual-site and quad-site configurations or direct plunge-to-board operation. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is available in single, dual, and quad configurations.[1]

What throughput and indexing figures are given for the Cohu Rasco SO1000?

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is specified for up to 14000 UPH. The Cohu Rasco SO1000 is specified with index time down to 500 ms.[1]

What temperature capability is given for the Cohu Rasco SO1000?

The Cohu Rasco SO1000 supports a tri-temp range from -60°C to +175°C with temperature accuracy of +/- 2°C.[1]

Not publicly documented

The following facts about the Rasco SO1000 are absent from this record as of this revision. First-hand knowledge or a citation closes a gap; every submission is reviewed before publication.

  • No publicly documented production dates or lifecycle milestones (introduction, end of production, EOL) for the Rasco SO1000 are on record.

    Answerable by: OEM historical records or a trade-press announcement

  • No publicly documented variants, configuration options, or revision breakpoints of the Rasco SO1000 are on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM product catalog or an engineer who ordered or specified the tool

  • The control-system platform and OS era of the Rasco SO1000 are not on record.

    Answerable by: an engineer who operated it or OEM installation records

  • No publicly documented failure modes or field errata for the Rasco SO1000 are on record.

    Answerable by: a field service engineer, process engineer, or maintenance technician

  • The process node or technology generation of the Rasco SO1000 is not on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM datasheet or a fab qualification report

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Sources & citations

Sources (2)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]cohu.com — cohu.comcohu.com
  2. [2]cohu.com — cohu.comcohu.com
Was this page accurate?

Last updated Oct 16, 2026.

Compare with similar tools

View all →