Waferpedia

Signatone

WL-210

WL-210 — web.archive.org
Fig. 01WL-210web.archive.org[1]
  • Plate 01シグナトーン社製 WL-210 の概略ご紹介

    阪和トレーディング株式会社Watch on YouTube
  • Plate 02シグナトーン社製プローバー、WL-210 のご紹介

    阪和トレーディング株式会社Watch on YouTube

What is it?

The WL-210 RF / Microwave Probe Station is described as part of Signatone's WaveLink Series and built on the CheckMate architecture. The source states that it accepts shards through 8-inch wafers, substrates, PCB's, and ultra-thin wafers, and lists features including a massive one-piece machined aircraft aluminum base, a heavy-duty nickel steel platen, compound X-Y positioning, independent platen height control, chuck biasing options, and a tilt-back microscope for access.

What can it run?

Process applications and technology nodes documented for this tool.

  • RF & MW probing
  • Failure Analysis

What do the numbers mean?

Vacuum & pumping1

Micropositioner support
Supports bolt-down, vacuum, and magnetic base micropositioners[1]
Accurate?

Wafer handling3

Wafer/substrate compatibility
Accepts shards through 8" wafers, substrates, PCB's, and ultra-thin wafers[1]
Accurate?
Chuck and stage assembly
Non-ferrous chuck and stage assembly reduces magnetic interference and crosstalk[1]
Accurate?
Chuck biasing
Banana / BNC / Triax chuck biasing[1]
Accurate?

Control & software1

Platen control
Independent platen height (locking) and contact / separate control[1]
Accurate?

Configuration & options5

Base
Massive 2" one-piece machined aircraft aluminum base for stability[1]
Accurate?
Platen
Large heavy-duty nickel steel platen with 4 point planar lift[1]
Accurate?
Positioning stage
Fast, accurate and repeatable compound X-Y stage for sub-micron positioning[1]
Accurate?
Probe card holder
Quick-Change probe card holder option with independent theta adjust[1]
Accurate?
Microscope
Tilt-back microscope provides unobstructed fixturing access[1]
Accurate?

Vintage & configurations

Documented models & variants

DesignationGenerationVintageChangesSource
WL-210EE-Manual station with remote motor control, environmental chamber support for electrical shielding or frost-free probing, a 10:1 vernier switch, and full upgradeability including thermal and semi-automatic configurations.web.archive.org[1]
Interested in this tool?
Embed spec card

What does it need to run?

Site utility requirements, footprint, and infrastructure needed to install and operate this tool. Sourced from public records.

  • Micropositioner supportSupports bolt-down, vacuum, and magnetic base micropositioners[1]

Where are the manuals?

Generated from public-source data on file. Enter your email to access — nothing is published; details are routed privately.

Not publicly documented

Field notes

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Not publicly documented

The following facts about the WL-210 are absent from this record as of this revision. First-hand knowledge or a citation closes a gap; every submission is reviewed before publication.

  • No publicly documented production dates or lifecycle milestones (introduction, end of production, EOL) for the WL-210 are on record.

    Answerable by: OEM historical records or a trade-press announcement

  • The control-system platform and OS era of the WL-210 are not on record.

    Answerable by: an engineer who operated it or OEM installation records

  • No publicly documented failure modes or field errata for the WL-210 are on record.

    Answerable by: a field service engineer, process engineer, or maintenance technician

  • The process node or technology generation of the WL-210 is not on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM datasheet or a fab qualification report

  • No publicly documented compatible parts, consumables, or accessories for the WL-210 are on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM parts catalog or a service engineer

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Sources & citations

Sources (1)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]web.archive.orgweb.archive.orgweb.archive.org
Was this page accurate?

Last updated Jul 29, 2026.

Compare with similar tools

View all →