Waferpedia

GCA

6300 DSW

Lithography150mm5X g-line wafer stepperg-lineGCA 6300 DSW family
Research Quality: 50% complete
6300 DSW — cnfusers.cornell.edu
Fig. 016300 DSWcnfusers.cornell.edu[1]

Wafer size

150mm

Node / era

5X g-line wafer stepper

Performance

<0.25 µm[1]

Optics

g-line (436 nm)[1]

What is it?

The Cornell CNF page describes the GCA 6300 DSW as a 5X g-line wafer stepper using a 436 nm lens column with 0.30 NA and 5:1 reduction, variable field size up to 15 mm square, and wafer sizes from 3 inches up to 150 mm plus smaller pieces. The UCSB Nanofab wiki describes a GCA 6300 i-line wafer stepper with 5x reduction, Olympus 2142 optics, and support for piece parts up to 6-inch wafers, but this source does not identify the DSW variant specifically.

What can it run?

Process applications and technology nodes documented for this tool.

  • photolithography
  • step and repeat exposure
  • high-resolution lithography
  • critical alignment

What do the numbers mean?

Wafer handling4

Tool type
5X g-line wafer stepper[1]
Accurate?
Wafer accommodation
3" up to 150 mm; smaller pieces[1]
Accurate?
Tool type
i-line wafer stepper[2]
Accurate?
Minimum substrate size
~10 x 10 mm[2]
Accurate?

Optics & imaging8

Exposure wavelength
g-line (436 nm)[1]
Accurate?
Numerical aperture
0.30 NA[1]
Accurate?
Mask size
5" x 0.090"-thick masks[1]
Accurate?
Step and repeat exposure system
laser-controlled stage motion[1]
Accurate?
Lens
Zeiss lens with 0.30 numerical aperture[1]
Accurate?
Exposure wavelength
i-line (365 nm)[2]
Accurate?
Lens
Olympus 2142; NA = 0.42[2]
Accurate?
Mask plates
5x5x0.090 inches[2]
Accurate?

Performance1

Registered alignment
<0.25 µm[1]
Accurate?

Configuration & options5

Reduction ratio
5:1[1]
Accurate?
Variable field size
up to 15 mm square[1]
Accurate?
Minimum feature size
<0.9 µm[1]
Accurate?
Reduction ratio
5x[2]
Accurate?
Maximum die size
~15 mm x 15 mm[2]
Accurate?

Vintage & configurations

Documented models & variants

DesignationGenerationVintageChangesSource
GCA 6300 DSW 5X g-line Wafer Stepperg-lineDescribed as a 5X g-line wafer stepper.cnfusers.cornell.edu[1]
GCA 6300 I-Line Wafer Stepperi-lineDescribed as an i-line wafer stepper with manual wafer loading and up to 6-inch wafers.wiki.nanofab.ucsb.edu[2]
Interested in this tool?
Embed spec card

Where are the manuals?

Publicly hosted documents referencing this tool, linked at their original location. Hosted by the linked institutions — availability may change.

Generated from public-source data on file. Enter your email to access — nothing is published; details are routed privately.

Not publicly documented

Field notes

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Not publicly documented

The following facts about the 6300 DSW are absent from this record as of this revision. First-hand knowledge or a citation closes a gap; every submission is reviewed before publication.

  • No publicly documented production dates or lifecycle milestones (introduction, end of production, EOL) for the 6300 DSW are on record.

    Answerable by: OEM historical records or a trade-press announcement

  • The control-system platform and OS era of the 6300 DSW are not on record.

    Answerable by: an engineer who operated it or OEM installation records

  • No publicly documented failure modes or field errata for the 6300 DSW are on record.

    Answerable by: a field service engineer, process engineer, or maintenance technician

  • No publicly documented compatible parts, consumables, or accessories for the 6300 DSW are on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM parts catalog or a service engineer

  • The operating principle of the 6300 DSW is not documented in this record.

    Answerable by: an equipment physicist or OEM application engineer

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Sources & citations

Sources (2)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]cnfusers.cornell.educnfusers.cornell.educnfusers.cornell.edu
  2. [2]wiki.nanofab.ucsb.eduwiki.nanofab.ucsb.eduwiki.nanofab.ucsb.edu
Was this page accurate?

Last updated Jul 29, 2026.

Compare with similar tools

View all →